Lucknow, India – The political landscape shook today as Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath finally responded to the growing controversy surrounding the upcoming Bollywood film “Phule”, a biopic based on the revolutionary reformers Jyotirao Phule and Savitribai Phule.

What was meant to be a cinematic tribute has now snowballed into a cultural battlefield – with Yogi Adityanath’s powerful statement igniting both praise and outrage across the nation.

And what he said? NO ONE saw it coming.


The Movie That’s Already Dividing India

“Phule,” starring Pratik Gandhi as Jyotirao Phule and Patralekha as Savitribai Phule, promises to tell the untold story of the 19th-century couple who fought caste discrimination, championed women’s education, and took on the rigid Brahmanical order of British India.

From the moment its trailer dropped, the film has triggered a storm of reactions.

Liberals called it “a much-needed truth-telling.”

Right-wing influencers warned it was “anti-Hindu propaganda.”

Historians praised its accuracy – but said it would rattle the status quo.

But amid all the noise, one voice remained silent – until now.


Yogi Adityanath’s First Reaction – And It’s a BOMBSHELL

In a fiery press conference in Lucknow this morning, Yogi Adityanath finally addressed the growing national debate. His words were sharp, calculated – and deeply political.

“Cinema is a powerful tool. It can educate, or it can mislead. I urge filmmakers to be responsible when dealing with subjects that touch the soul of Bharat’s ancient fabric.”

But that was just the warm-up.

In a move that stunned both supporters and critics, Yogi directly referenced “Phule”, saying:

“If this movie is a true tribute to Jyotiba Phule, then it must celebrate his contribution to society – not use him as a weapon to divide Hindus on caste lines. We will not tolerate selective storytelling that pushes a political agenda.”

Within minutes, #YogiOnPhule began trending on X (formerly Twitter), with reactions pouring in from across the spectrum.


Supporters Cheer, Critics Erupt

BJP leaders quickly backed the Chief Minister’s stance, with Union Minister Giriraj Singh calling it a “bold reminder that history must unite, not polarize.”

But opposition leaders saw red.

Congress MP Rahul Gandhi hit back, tweeting:

“Jyotirao Phule stood against caste oppression. If telling his truth is ‘divisive,’ then what are we defending – truth, or tyranny?”

Film director Ananth Mahadevan, meanwhile, defended his work, stating:

“We made ‘Phule’ with facts, not fiction. If truth makes people uncomfortable, maybe it’s time we face it.”

The cast of the film has so far remained silent – but sources close to Pratik Gandhi say he’s “disheartened but not surprised.”


Public Reaction: “Let Us Watch and Decide!”

On the streets of Mumbai, Delhi, and Varanasi, everyday Indians are joining the conversation.

Ramesh Patel, a teacher in Banaras, told our correspondent:

“Jyotiba Phule is a hero. If a movie helps my students learn about him, I support it. Why fear education?”

But not all agree. A BJP youth leader in Gorakhpur claimed:

“This movie will ignite anti-Hindu sentiments. We will protest if it’s released in its current form.”

The battle lines are being drawn. And the release date hasn’t even arrived yet.

Yogi Adityanath, Akhilesh Yadav


Censorship Ahead? Or a Political Masterstroke?

Insiders at the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) confirm that the film is “under scrutiny” after recent complaints – with some demanding cuts, disclaimers, or even a complete ban.

Sources suggest that Yogi’s statement may influence further reviews, especially in BJP-ruled states.

But political analysts argue this could be a calculated move ahead of upcoming elections.

“Yogi has tapped into a cultural fault line,” said senior journalist Barkha Dutt. “He’s turning this film into a political litmus test – without ever directly calling for censorship.”


So, What’s Next for ‘Phule’?

The makers of “Phule” have not issued any official change to the release plan – but insiders say private screenings for political figures may be arranged in the coming days.

Meanwhile, Parallels are being drawn between “Phule” and earlier films like “Article 15” and “Padmaavat” – both of which faced fierce backlash and massive political attention before ultimately becoming box-office successes.

Will “Phule” survive the storm?

Or will Yogi Adityanath’s intervention change the fate of Indian cinema yet again?


One thing is certain: This isn’t just a film anymore.
It’s a movement.
A mirror.
And a battleground for India’s past – and its future.

Stay tuned. The war of words is just beginning.

CM Yogi said- ‘Politics is not a full time job for me’, now Akhilesh Yadav’s strong reaction has come to the fore

Akhilesh Yadav Attack CM Yogi: Samajwadi Party leader Akhilesh Yadav took a dig at CM Yogi Adityanath’s statement in which Yogi said that politics is not a full time job for him. Akhilesh said that true politics is a field of service which demands a whole life.

Akhilesh Yadav Attack CM Yogi: Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav has indirectly taunted Uttar Pradesh CM Yogi Adityanath. Actually, during an interview, CM Yogi dismissed speculations of him becoming the Prime Minister in the future and said that politics is not a ‘full time job’ for him and he is a Yogi at heart. Akhilesh Yadav has given a sharp reaction to this statement of CM Yogi without taking any name.

Posting on X, Akhilesh Yadav said, “Actually those who consider it part time should not do politics because ‘true politics is a field of service’ for which 24 hours a day and a whole life are not enough.”

Know what CM Yogi said?
When asked about the growing support for him as a potential Prime Minister, CM Yogi said, “Politics is not a ‘full time job’ for me. Right now I am working here but in reality I am a Yogi.” When asked how long he plans to remain in politics, the Chief Minister said, “There will be a time limit for this too.” When asked whether his answer means that politics is not a ‘full time job’ for him, Adityanath reiterated, “Yes, that is what I am saying.”